- From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 13:09:38 +0000
- To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Message-ID: <F4EB96C1-2CC1-42A9-B8CE-EAEA9EECB44D@csiro.au>
The ODRL Community Group has now implemented a test PROF-based template for defining community profiles: https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/core-profile/odrl-profile-template.ttl. Using it, they have created a draft profile for RightsML: https://www.iptc.org/std-dev/RightsML/2.0/odrl-profile-RightsML_2.0-draft01.ttl. Discussion about this test implementation has centred around the following points: 1. ODRL CG being happy with the general direction of PROF * it gives them a simple way to define profile parts and relations they say 2. Confusion about the object instance values for dct:conformsTo * compared with the values for dct:format which are areay (IANA Media Types) * I have created an issue for this: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/916 3. What constitute sensible URIs for profiles * E.g. the core ODRL 2 .2 profile, is the best URI http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/core or something else? * They intend to resolve this by listing URIs the decide on for central ODRL profiles at their profiling Best Practice page: https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/wiki/Profile_Best_Practice 4. What PROF’s Test Suite (https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof/#testsuite) will contain * It will contain notes on how to validate instance data against PROF’s own SHACL constraints (early draft): https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profilesont/full-constraints.ttl * It will indicate tools that can be used in different environments to do this, such as pySHACL: https://github.com/RDFLib/pySHACL Overall, very positive response to PROF from the ODRL group. It serves a couple of their needs and they can contribute back to PROF development with the profiling requirements they have already produced. Nick
Received on Monday, 6 May 2019 13:10:13 UTC