- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 13:35:32 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@davebrowning : > Actual change looks okay to me, but there is a conflict that needs addressing in the list of namespaces. (Would have just fixed that but realised I wasn't quite sure how it had come about - think the main branch has had some added (e.g. oa: earl:) but when I look in the conflict resolution screen it looks....strange.... I have solved the conflict, my opinion is that we can drop the "\<code\>\</code\>" tags and keep the namespace definitions we currently have in the gh-pages. I remember myself adding some of the additional namespaces as they were used in the document but not declared. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/903#issuecomment-489097306 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 May 2019 13:35:33 UTC