W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)

From: Ruben Verborgh via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:16:37 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-512134251-1563347795-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> These are variations of the data structure that do not alter its semantics at all. The > > […]
> [JSON-LD profiles](https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#forms-of-json-ld) are an example of this.

If you interpret a JSON-LD document as an RDF graph, than no, its semantics do not change.

If, however, you interpret the JSON-LD document as a JSON document (which is a primary reason for JSON-LD profiles and framing), then yes, semantics do change from the JSON perspective. A JSON key that didn't exist in one JSON-LD profile, can have meaning in another.

Hence, I find the exclusion of JSON-LD profiles artificial.

GitHub Notification of comment by RubenVerborgh
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/976#issuecomment-512134251 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2019 07:16:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC