W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)

From: Stephen Richard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 18:02:47 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-508829173-1562349766-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@andrea-perego I"d suggest that what a profile is about (semantics vs. syntax) depends on the scope of the base specification that is being profiled.  If the base spec is a conceptual (semantics only), then the profile will be about semantics. If a base spec is about syntax and usage conventions (e.g. an interchange format like ISO19139, GeoSciML v4), then profiles of that would be about syntax and usage.  

GitHub Notification of comment by smrgeoinfo
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/976#issuecomment-508829173 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 5 July 2019 18:02:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC