- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 20:32:09 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@riccardoAlbertoni said: > Ok, let's keep the first sentence as it is, and let's revise @smrgeoinfo's proposal differently. > (changes to @smrgeoinfo's proposal are marked below in bold) > > > dcat:Resource represents a dataset, **a data service or any other item** described by a metadata record in a catalog. This class is not intended to be used directly, but is the parent class of dcat:Dataset, dcat:DataService and dcat:Catalog. Member items in a catalog should be members of one of the sub-classes, or of a sub-class of these, or of a sub-class of dcat:Resource defined in a DCAT profile or other DCAT application. dcat:Resource is effectively an extension point for defining a catalog of any kind of resource. > > Would this make happy both @andrea-perego and @smrgeoinfo? > If you prefer we can even use "resource" in place of "item", but it would be a little tautological. I would indeed replace "item" with "resource", and I would rephrase the above definition as follows: > dcat:Resource represents a dataset, a data service or any other resource that may be described by a metadata record in a catalog. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/966#issuecomment-507833577 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2019 20:32:11 UTC