Re: Minutes from CNEG meeting 2019-04-11 - un-tagging requirements, really?

• From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
• Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:31:46 +0200
• To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <35605d22-2d70-4161-bea2-568bb2983af8@few.vu.nl>

Hi Lars, everyone,

I am not sure to understand why removing the profile-negotiation tag from requirements that have been met. They are still relevant to negotiation even if they are met, aren't they? I would consider closing them is a much better option (though one may argue it's better done in plenary). Loosing the connection from Use Cases and Requirements to our products does not seem good - especially if there are some automatic listings made by using these tags...

Cheers,

Antoine

On 12/04/2019 12:35, Svensson, Lars wrote:
> ... are at [1].
> 
> We spent most of the meeting reviewing open GitHub issues, deciding to flag some of them for closing and to remove the profile-negotiation tag from requirements we consider have been met.
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2019/04/11-dxwgcneg-minutes
> 
> Best,
> 
> Lars
> 
> *** Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ***
> 

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2019 15:32:18 UTC