Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX]

When we last looked at this I had the impression we could/wanted to do more (for example the continuous publication stuff), but its also true that that we can always do more... I do think we've addressed the requirement, and the other scenarios are tracked by actions [here]( and [here](

re: a potential "Note" - I have no strong opinion (though I do think the ontology is useful)

GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 06:33:17 UTC