- From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 06:33:16 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
When we last looked at this I had the impression we could/wanted to do more (for example the continuous publication stuff), but its also true that that we can always do more... I do think we've addressed the requirement, and the other scenarios are tracked by actions [here](https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/173) and [here](https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/174). re: a potential "Note" - I have no strong opinion (though I do think the ontology is useful) -- GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/71#issuecomment-424601015 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 06:33:17 UTC