- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:31:25 +0200
- To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
I apologize that I missed this in my earlier review of the document. The DCAT draft says: "Issue 72 DCAT provides a generic metadata vocabulary for cataloguing datasets. Profiles of DCAT are required for specific applications and disciplines. Providing a model and formalization for DCAT profiles is planned to be an important part of this revision. Also see Issue #73, Issue #74, Issue #75."[1] Two things about this: 1) The issues cited here have been generally considered to be relevant to the profile guidance document, not the DCAT revision. Issue 72 has the label DCAT but that issue does not seem to have been revisited much since it was created. Issue #75 has been closed. 2) I believe that we determined, with the help of Phil Archer, who authored the charter, that the profiles guidance is not intended to be guidance for DCAT profiles but for profiles in general, so a promise of a "formalization for DCAT profiles" isn't what we'll deliver. Therefore, it would seem that this section (12 in the current document) should point to the (future) profile guidance document and not state that "formalization for DCAT profiles is planned". There may be other useful things to say her about DCAT and profiles; we can add that to the agenda for the F2F where we intend to review (and solidify) the relationships between the deliverables. [1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#profiles -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2018 14:31:56 UTC