[dxwg] Pull Request: Sundry editorial

davebrowning has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== Sundry editorial ==
This PR includes another general cleanup as email

1. Many which credit the original DCAT 2014 for section content could probably now be squashed. There is pervasive re-writing by now. **There was only one worth removing.  I've left a single instance (the Introduction) to point out we have the same intention as 2014**
2. The note on DCAT scope in the overview could probably be shortened to a couple of sentences . **Don't agree - it depends which parts of the document you read - having this  in the overview is better than having it in Conformance like 2014.  If we do a primer....**
3. There is a bit too much repetition – e.g. there is an almost identical note about dctype:Dataset in both the Overview and against the actual definition of Dataset in chapter 6 - **Done**
4. Issue #253 is closed – remove pink box in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Class:Dataset **Done**
5. Issue #52 could be closed and pink box removed from https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Class:Distribution **Have added new Note to cover other aspect/clarifications on use of Distributions - if that works then yes, we can close**
6. Issue #55 is closed – remove pink box in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Class:Distribution **Done**
7. I think issue #106 was overtaken by the resolution of #52? Remove pink box in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Class:Distribution **Done - change note also tweaked**

I've added some text to point at appendix with change list to hopefully guide the reader.   Also linked the relevant open issue to `dct:rights` as well 'dct:license`, and a couple of minor links.

I **haven't** rationalised the vocabularly definition in this PR.  If there is time I could do that tomorrow.

See https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/357

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2018 14:06:16 UTC