- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 07:17:46 +1000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>, Natasha Noy <noy@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9LzhWMGyvyL3y8UcN7q_7N-HB+DKXQCpmx5qoaBnWpzpGw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dan, et al I spoke to Ed Parsons about this, and he advised that it was unlikely that any specific DCAT profiles would be supported, but my thinking is that if you support DCAT + some way of handling, say, statistical datasets using datacube - that support would actually constitute a DCAT profile logically, and could be described as such. Happy to work with you therefore to describe what you do support AS profiles, rather than push a profile at you :-) It would make sense to formalise goverance of geospatial data profiles via OGC - as a sub-profile of GeoDCAT for example, if you support GeoDCAT (????) I'm trying to track this issue across a number of statistical data fora - but struggling to identify a center of gravity for the discussion - do you have any suggestions Rob Atkinson On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 06:33 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > You beat me to it :) > > (cc:'ing Natasha Noy who led this work at at Google, and who might not be > able to post to this list directly but I can relay any bounced posts) > > I am really happy to see this work launch and am happy to answer any > questions, here or offlist as folk prefer. > > Schema.org's dataset vocab is based on the core pattern from the early > DCAT drafts a few years ago (and so shares its strengths and weaknesses). > The Google implementation is based on JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata embedded > in the main per-dataset pages. While we focussed more on Schema.org there > is some understanding of DCAT too and our support for both will hopefully > evolve with the ecosystem (and updated W3C specs) over time. Other > questions of course loom, e.g. how this relates to markup for fact > checking, or for describing funders and projects, specialist domains (e.g. > bioschemas, ...), or other W3C efforts like Data Cube and CSVW.... > > Dan > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, 19:38 Annette Greiner, <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > >> I noticed their developer guide says "We can understand structured data >> in Web pages about datasets, using either schema.org Dataset markup >> <http://schema.org/Dataset>, or equivalent structures represented in W3C >> <http://www.w3.org/>'s Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) format >> <https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/>." :) >> >> -Annette >> >> On 9/5/18 11:16 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: >> >> "Making it easier to find datasets" at the Google Blog: >> https://www.blog.google/products/search/making-it-easier-discover-datasets/ >> >> You may already be aware of their developer guide for datasets: >> https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/dataset >> >> which advises the use of schema.org. >> >> Apologies if this is old news to some of you. >> >> >> -- >> Annette Greiner >> NERSC Data and Analytics Services >> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 21:18:42 UTC