W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2018

Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies mapping [RVM]

From: Vladimir Alexiev via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:08:15 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-418610334-1536127693-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
What you describe is an Application Profile.  Best done with rdf shapes, in
addition to prose.
I don't see how you can change the TRs of those other vocabs because it's
not easy to reconvene those working groups. Best to do it externally, as
you suggest.

http://vocab.getty.edu/doc/#Descriptive_Information describes one such
combination (void, dcat and adms) in prose and diagrams

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 16:08 bertvannuffelen <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> I believe it is of interest to express some general guidance on how DCAT
> and the other dataset-defining vocabularies are related and what the best
> practices are in combining them. However, the best way is to put that
> relationship/guidance in the other vocabularies (too). Hence they have to
> be revised/updated also, otherwise one has 2 messages: one from the
> DCAT-2018 perspective and one from datacube(2014)/void(2011) perspective.
> And that leads to more confusion.
> For me this is a meta expression over all the vocabularies & application
> profiles. Not sure if there is a place to put this.
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88#issuecomment-418360724>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAguukBL8DIWGQ8lvj2b7mhke6AzYfiNks5uXntggaJpZM4Rjksq>
> .

GitHub Notification of comment by VladimirAlexiev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88#issuecomment-418610334 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 06:08:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC