Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies mapping [RVM]

What you describe is an Application Profile.  Best done with rdf shapes, in
addition to prose.
I don't see how you can change the TRs of those other vocabs because it's
not easy to reconvene those working groups. Best to do it externally, as
you suggest. describes one such
combination (void, dcat and adms) in prose and diagrams

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 16:08 bertvannuffelen <> wrote:

> I believe it is of interest to express some general guidance on how DCAT
> and the other dataset-defining vocabularies are related and what the best
> practices are in combining them. However, the best way is to put that
> relationship/guidance in the other vocabularies (too). Hence they have to
> be revised/updated also, otherwise one has 2 messages: one from the
> DCAT-2018 perspective and one from datacube(2014)/void(2011) perspective.
> And that leads to more confusion.
> For me this is a meta expression over all the vocabularies & application
> profiles. Not sure if there is a place to put this.
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <>, or mute
> the thread
> <>
> .

GitHub Notification of comment by VladimirAlexiev
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2018 06:08:22 UTC