ADMS is certainly a relevant profile of DCAT for describing all the asset management aspects of cataloguing profiles. We still need to subclass it for the specifics of profiles as semantic assets to meet identifued requirements. And profiles still exist outside the context of asset management (but arguably shouldnt). More analagous to a SKOS vocabulary... its a type of semantic asset we want to catalogue... but developing and testing one needs the clean model, not the administrative metadata rules. I will work on examples capturing the natural alignment with ADMS following the DCAT ADMS precedents. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/323#issuecomment-417960694 using your GitHub accountReceived on Sunday, 2 September 2018 21:20:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC