- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 23:31:52 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo - thanks - that clarification will hopefully help us back out of this rathole :-) Note that the profiles ontology, which provides an implementation pathway for these concerns, allows us to reference multiple artefacts with different roles - and these roles can include conformance validation - or guidance. They are agnostic of the actual language (none seems perfect and universally applicable anyway), but have a conformsTo property to allow a client to see what language the artefact itself is written in. I think this addresses your concerns, but please feel free to ask further questions, suggest counter-examples or even suggest improved wording in the relevant deliverable documents as they emerge. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/507#issuecomment-434882517 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2018 23:31:53 UTC