Re: [dxwg] DCAT - alignment (profile)

I have another question about the 1-to-many entries. Wouldn't they only work in the direction of many-to-one? You can translate schema:datasetTimeInterval and schema:temporal (etc.) to dct:temporal, but if you are going in the direction from DCAT to, which of the three properties would you translate dct:temporal to?

It seems that if the two vocabularies in a cross-walk are not symmetrical then you actually need two cross-walks (or some clever use of the table format) to show both directions. You may decide that you don't need both directions, but in that case the one-to-many properties should be reduced to one-to-one from DCAT to

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 27 October 2018 11:10:32 UTC