W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > October 2018

Re: [dxwg] Decide on a structure for main conneg doc content

From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:22:14 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-431870308-1540222382-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Looking at [ยง6 Realisations](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#realisations) in the current ED, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to group the descriptions by use case, e. g.
* Profile Listing (#285, #286, #288, #73)
  * Realisation through QSA
  * Realisation through Conneg
* Profile Negotiation (#287, #289, #266, #265, #261, #74, #162, #217)
  * Realisation through QSA
  * Realisation through Conneg

Then we could move all the relevant requirements from the end of the document to where they will be dealt with (once they are approved, that is...) 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/422#issuecomment-431870308 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 22 October 2018 19:22:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:25 UTC