Re: [dxwg] Decide on a structure for main conneg doc content

Looking at [ยง6 Realisations](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/#realisations) in the current ED, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to group the descriptions by use case, e. g.
* Profile Listing (#285, #286, #288, #73)
  * Realisation through QSA
  * Realisation through Conneg
* Profile Negotiation (#287, #289, #266, #265, #261, #74, #162, #217)
  * Realisation through QSA
  * Realisation through Conneg

Then we could move all the relevant requirements from the end of the document to where they will be dealt with (once they are approved, that is...) 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/422#issuecomment-431870308 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 22 October 2018 19:22:15 UTC