Re: [dxwg] Profiles may provide rules on cardinality of terms (including “recommended”) [ID41] (5.41)

> My feeling about the roles is that they need to be a separate vocabulary namespace

Yes, agreed, we want to do the pattern that the ISO does of a data model (ontology) that's fairly fixed but vocabs (instances) that can be publsihed somewhat separately and added to.

For this reason we kept the `ResourceRole` [insances](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profilesont/resource_roles.ttl) separate from the [ontology](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/profilesont/profilesont.ttl). The listed roles are clearly far from complete but indicate where roles should be placed.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/276#issuecomment-427765489 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 09:05:51 UTC