Re: [dxwg] Profiles may provide rules on cardinality of terms (including “recommended”) [ID41] (5.41)

> My feeling about the roles is that they need to be a separate vocabulary namespace

Yes, agreed, we want to do the pattern that the ISO does of a data model (ontology) that's fairly fixed but vocabs (instances) that can be publsihed somewhat separately and added to.

For this reason we kept the `ResourceRole` [insances]( separate from the [ontology]( The listed roles are clearly far from complete but indicate where roles should be placed.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 09:05:51 UTC