Thanks @agreiner for the comment! And @kcoyle for clarifying. Am I right in understanding that this issue is then very close to #366 , as @kcoyle said there that in her mind the 'related work' in section 4 was mostly about giving examples? If yes I'm going to do a cross-reference (and not add a mention of this issue in the doc itself) Also, in this case I could propose to elaborate on @kcoyle 's suggestion in #366 whereby she suggest to move these 'related work examples' in the introduction. I think we won't be able to put a fully fledged description of the examples in the introduction. But what we could do is to have a *brief* description of the 'related work examples' in the intro. We could then compensate for this shortness by coming back to these examples in sections 6 or 7, i.e. as examples of using ProfDesc to create descriptions of profiles and examples of our recommendations being implemented in the wild (even if these implementations are pre-existing to our recommendations, they could still be relevant as examples). Would this be ok? -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/419#issuecomment-426425431 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 2 October 2018 20:50:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:25 UTC