- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:05:25 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@kcoyle had put a note which I think relates to the issue: > I had thought of this as showing examples of TYPES of profiles. There are profiles like DCAT that take place within a community, make primary use of a base metadata schema, but add or remove based on local need. There are profiles like ODRL that have a very formal meaning (legal license) and are in essence cumulative, with the base standard elements assumed and specific rules for over-riding. There are profiles that use only the namespace of the base profile, but are defined subsets (BIBFRA.ME, but any other example of this would be fine - that's the one I know). And then we could perhaps find a profile that has no strong base profile (ADMS perhaps?) but combines elements as needed from a variety of sources and is independent of any existing vocabulary. The idea would be to show a range of profile motivations, designs, and community involvement. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/366#issuecomment-426411326 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2018 20:05:27 UTC