- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:42:21 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I have similar concerns to @makxdekkers about being tied too closely to one (admittedly important) application. As I showed above, the funder information is already available through two property chains: 1. via a `proj:Project` instance ``` ( prov:wasGeneratedBy proj:wasFundedThrough prov:agent ) ``` 2. via a qualified relationship with an agent ``` ( prov:qualifiedAttribution prov:agent ) ``` when the value of dcat:hadRole is http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd or http://registry.it.csiro.au/def/isotc211/CI_RoleCode/funder. But it is always a balance - common information should be easy to find, but how many roles should have their own predicates. We know that the old Dublin Core terms `creater`, `contributor` and `publisher` are not enough, so a scalable attribution facility is important. The MARC Relators and ISO CI_RoleCode vocabularies cover most bases, so perhaps that's enough? I guess it would be optimal if we were able to recommend one of these. While it is from the GI domain, the ISO list does have the advantage that it is mixed in with a whole load of other stuff ... -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/66#issuecomment-441489089 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 November 2018 00:42:23 UTC