- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:48:36 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> Yes, dct:creator and adms:schemaAgency should be for the same organisation. The literal option was provided because schema agencies might not be in Linked Data space and have no URI.` Then, assuming we want to distinguish between (a) the authority that defined the identifier scheme (DOI foundation), and (b) the authority responsible for assigning and maintaining identifiers using that scheme (IEEE), we need to consider a property distinct from dct:creator for (b) I see two alternative options here 1. add a new extra dcat property ( e.g., named dcat:idMantainer/dcat:IdAuthority ) to indicate (b) the authority responsible for assigning and maintaining identifiers using that scheme (IEEE). 2. use of dct:publisher for indicating (b) instead of defining a new property such as dcat:idMantainer/dcat:IdAuthority . However, I've got the impression dct:creator / dct:publisher are used interchangeably to refer to schema agency (i.e., DOI is the @smrgeoinfo's example), so I do not know if this is really possible. Which of the two the group thinks is more reasonable? Does anyone see further options? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/53#issuecomment-441259200 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 23 November 2018 14:48:38 UTC