- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:56:08 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
[Proposal 1 in the wiki](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-Identifiers#proposal-1) suggests using - dct:identifier for primary id - adms:identifier for secondary id as far as I have understood, this was the guideline made by [DCAT-AP to manage duplicates](https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/release/dcat-ap-how-manage-duplicates), though I am not 100% sure this suggestion is still valid in the newest DCAT-AP release. @agbeltran Is this acceptable or Do you think we should add new specific terms in DCAT 2? I guess @andrea-perego and @makxdekkers might have their own view on the opportunities/issues behind the reuse of such a guideline. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/67#issuecomment-440992914 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2018 10:56:20 UTC