- From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:50:19 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
As regards @smrgeoinfo point on identifying both the identifier scheme and the organisation minting the identifiers, it seems to me that is a use case not covered by ADMS, as ```adms:schemaAgency``` covers the name of the "agency that manages the identifier scheme" as a literal, while ```dct:creator``` would be used to point to the representation of such organisation rather than a separate one? is that correct @makxdekkers ? Apart from that interpretation of ADMS, [example 7](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-Identifiers#representing--http-dereferenceable-secondary-identifier) would cover accounting for both the identifier scheme/type and the organisation maintaining it IMO. -- GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/53#issuecomment-440804392 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2018 20:50:20 UTC