- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:42:58 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo the issue of validation is no different for any other declarative statement. The semantics of conformsTo is that all constraints are met and all normative validation tests pass. People can still lie, or configure machines to do it for them by accident... at this stage there is no "a little bit like" or "partially conformsTo" mechanism - "aspiresTo" ? We lack a motivating Use Case for explicit DQ statements about conformance evidence. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/273#issuecomment-440455624 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2018 22:42:59 UTC