- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:10:54 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I'm not sure I understand the link between identifiers, conformsTo and the original wording of the requirement, or @jpullmann 's rewording. This goes in solution space, no? My take is that the requirement is about expressing that a profile can serve the validation of data. That the profile contributes to such validation goal by providing specifications for validation rules, expressed in various (computer or human-readable) languages. The requirement then observes that this validation may happen at different levels and to different extents (this is what @jpullmann calls 'types' if I understand it right), considering that the languages to express validation rules have different scopes and expressivity levels. Is it something we can agree on? -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/273#issuecomment-440197995 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2018 09:11:06 UTC