- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:24:19 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@makxdekkers said: > @dr-shorthair I really like the approach you're proposing. I can see it solving a lot of the problems I've seen -- including people attaching per-year data to a multi-annual dataset. I think we must be very careful in not overcomplicating the use of DCAT. Making explicit the different level of granularity, accuracy, spatio-temporal coverage of distributions may be relevant in some specific use cases, but it is more common that metadata maintainers don't have this information. I would be more in favour of extending the existing approach, by keep on using `dcat:Distribution` (as everybody is doing now), and by specifying in addition information concerning granularity, etc. (which is now done only at the level of `dcat:Dataset`). This would be more backward compatible, and it would make it possible to extend existing records accordingly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/411#issuecomment-439559048 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 16 November 2018 23:24:20 UTC