- From: Stephen Richard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:57:59 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
after a review of the discussion, it looks like there are two proposals: ADMS kind of approach-- identifiers have a datatype like skos:notation, i.e. typed literal, and the value for the typed literal is the identifier type. e.g. dcat:identifier "978-3-16-148410-0"^^<https://www.iso.org/standard/36563.html> Its not clear to me how ADMS would serialize the other properties (version and managing authority) schema.org, ISO19115, DATS approach-- make identifier an object/class with a code property (the identifier string), a scheme property, maybe an authority property. Personally I think the second approach is more transparent and widely used. Schema.org implements the identifier as a PropertyValue, which obfuscates things; DATS uses 'identifier' and 'identifierSource' as the property names; ISO19115-1 uses 'code', 'codespace', and 'version', with a citation for the 'authority' DataCite has 'identifier' and 'identifierType' proposal: class: dcat:identifier Properties: dcat:code -- the identifier string; for a well formed URI this would be all that's necessary dcat:identifierType -- literal or URI dcat:version -- literal authority -- foaf:organization -- GitHub Notification of comment by smrgeoinfo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/53#issuecomment-438863816 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 23:58:03 UTC