- From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:22:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@jpullmann scripsit:
> section 6.1.1.2 Using a HTTP Link header field
>
> * Example 2, Using a Link-header to point list available profiles
> * the "Content-Location" does not seem to be used in accordance to HTTP spec, since referring to profile and not to a particular resource representation
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.14
Hmm, don't quite understand this: `http://example.org/a/resource.prof1.ttl` is a representation URI (or URL). The profile URIs are `urn:example:profile:1` and `urn:example:profile:2`.
And as an aside: Please don't quote RFC 2616 but RFC 7230-7234. RFC 2616 is obsolete...
--
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/569#issuecomment-438678256 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 14:22:19 UTC