- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:35:55 -0800
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
On 11/13/18 12:48 AM, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu wrote: > 6. Section 3 starts with: > > [[ > Until this ontology, there was no formal W3C method for describing the objects (Internet resources) related to profiles. > ]] > > - This statement is quite generic, and it may be argued that it is not accurate. E.g., with the current vocabularies I can specify who is the publisher / author of a profile, to which standard / specification a profile conforms to. Also, I don't understand what "W3C method" should mean: the issue is whether a method exists or not, we are not creating one to fill a gap in W3C specs > - I suggest replacing "the objects (Internet resources)" with "the resources" This is one of the editorial comments that I have also on the conneg document. Although the "until this ..." may be introductory to the FPWD, it will not be appropriate for the document in later stages, and I think it is not generally W3C style. I suggest simply saying "This document defines a method ...". If desired, the "until this ontology..." could be included in the public call for comments that accompanies the FPWD. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 15:36:21 UTC