- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:12:42 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@kcoyle I havent unilaterally declare anything in or out of scope - scope is defined by Use Cases and requirements and consensus processes. So i was pointing out what you have rightly insisted previously, that we need to have these before we can bring this into scope. That said, illustrative text that is consistent with what is currently in scope can always be proposed and accepted on its own merits. We need the text proposed in the relevant issue so we can vote on it and then an editor can include into the documents. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-435204873 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2018 22:12:43 UTC