- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:27:26 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I am not in favour of linking a decision in this group to whether a software vendor -- even an important one like CKAN -- agrees to change its model. In my mind, we seem to have established that the DCAT model in this case is more flexible that the CKAN model. There is a clear way -- and there are already tools -- for CKAN data to be converted to the DCAT model, while converting in the other direction is more complicated. Could we try to wrap this up? My proposal is: (a) to make no changes to the DCAT model; (b) to add a Usage note to https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:distribution_license to explain why DCAT recommends licensing to be associated with Distributions and not with Datasets. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/104#issuecomment-377563032 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 30 March 2018 16:27:39 UTC