- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:00:09 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair asked: >> I think we need to take into account backward compatibility > > Do you mean > > 1. backward compatibility with DCAT 1.0 vocabulary or > 2. backward compatibility with some DCAT installations? My original comment was indeed related to DCAT 1.0, as it was about the idea of defining a subclass of `dcat:Distribution` - sorry for not having made this clear. As I said elsewhere, I'm not _a priori_ against the idea of defining a specific class for services, as first-class citizens (i.e., not as distributions). Of course, here there may be backward compatibility issues with Geo/DCAT-AP. But I think your proposal, @dr-shorthair , does address them. I have nonetheless some comments on the proposal at [Cataloguing data services](../wiki/Cataloguing-data-services). I'll post them to #172 . -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/56#issuecomment-376218293 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 16:00:18 UTC