- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 22:54:21 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
In addition to my previous comment: In #169, there has been a discussion on how to formally denote a revision to the first version of DCAT, and it seems that the supported solution is to use `owl:deprecated`. This does not implicitly exclude using annotation properties (as `vann:changes` / `skos:changeNote`), which are meant to explain the motivation behind the revision. However, `owl:deprecated` can be used only for the whole definition of a class or property in the DCAT namespace, but not for specific statements (as those concerning domain/range restrictions, subclasses, subproperties), unless we use reification. I'm raising this issue just to ask the WG whether we should go this way, or just use annotation properties for documenting revisions to specific statements. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/176#issuecomment-375930822 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2018 22:54:28 UTC