Re: [dxwg] original DCAT had foaf:Page where it looks like foaf:page was intended.

@kcoyle @draggett About 'withdrawing' RDF terms, there is already precedent of that in the DCAT [RDF schema](https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl). At the end of the schema file, there are three classes and five properties that were defined during development that did not make it into the Recommendation. These are all marked with:

`owl:deprecated true`

So that seems to be a machine-readable means to mark RDF terms as withdrawn.
 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/169#issuecomment-375218000 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2018 08:35:40 UTC