Re: [dxwg] original DCAT had foaf:Page where it looks like foaf:page was intended.

We could do that, but isn't our aim to replace the old DCAT spec with a new one, or do we continue use for both old and new specs, in which case errata for the old spec have a greater urgency?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by draggett
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/169#issuecomment-374879086 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 09:36:17 UTC