- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:22:27 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Hi, I have already created a "straw man" for a lightweight description of profiles independent of the profile specification language - potentially as part of dcat - since this is a concern for describing data sets and extends dct:conformsTo and dc:Standard just enough to declare relationships and bind to profile description resources. This is intended to support existing profile hierarchies (described in documents) as well as profile descriptions in OWL, SHACL or other choices. its at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/roba-profile/dcat/rdf Its agnostic about the composition method, but the definition of profile adoption does require constraints to be transitive - a profile cannot relax or change sense of an inherited constraint. I think its a good point to decide if thus is in scope and implied by current requirements, or if we want a more explicit UC and requirements. I dont believe we are in a position to require or develop a specific profile description vocabulary - but i would expect that DCAT profile guidance would be able to recommend use of W3C vocabularies such as SHACL and RDF-Datacube -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162#issuecomment-374041793 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2018 20:22:29 UTC