- From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:27:01 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> Based on the DCAT implementations I am aware of, my personal understanding is that dcat:Distribution is not considered as an independent entity, and in many cases it is denoted just as blank node. Which implicitly means that two dcat:Distribution's, although intensionally identical (i.e., because they have the same title, access URL, etc.), are nonetheless considered as two different distributions. To me this sounds like an argument to make `dcat:accessURL` (or at least `dcat:downloadURL` an `owl:inverseFunctionalProperty` since that would allow us to conclude that if two distributions have the same accessURL, they are the same distribution. -- GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/166#issuecomment-373653427 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 16 March 2018 09:27:03 UTC