- From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:13:43 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
The DDI-RDF discovery vocabulary (DISCO) does make some statements on [the relationship to DCAT and other vocabularies](http://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/discovery.html#relationship-to-data-cube-dcat-and-xkos) that I am including here for consideration: >Our [LogicalDataSet](http://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/discovery.html#dfn-disco-logicaldataset) is a subclass of DCAT’s Dataset, and our [DataFile](http://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/discovery.html#dfn-disco-datafile) is a subclass of DCAT’s >Distribution. DCAT makes few assumptions about the kind of datasets being described, and >focuses on general metadata about the datasets (mostly using Dublin Core), and on different ways >of distributing and accessing the dataset, including availability of the dataset in multiple formats. >Combining terms from both DCAT and the Discovery Vocabulary can be useful for a number of >reasons: > Describing collections (catalogs) of research datasets (DCAT) > Providing additional information about physical aspects (file size, file formats) of research data >files (DCAT) > Providing information about the data collection that produced the datasets in a data catalog >(disco) > Providing information about the logical structure (variables, concepts, etc.) of tabular datasets in >a data catalog (disco) >DCAT is richer for the description of collections and catalogue. Disco supports richer descriptions >of groups of datasets or individual datasets. In this spec, some of our examples are partially based >on DCAT (and we will indicate when this is the case). -- GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/164#issuecomment-373355860 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2018 12:13:46 UTC