W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [dxwg] further PROV alignment, including for mooted WebService class

From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:13:12 +1000
Message-ID: <CACfF9Lye5qg0k9x8u+5Te6xhpeAwPURa_=-Nv-7iDraODOq6Ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Note that such mappings tend to be "informative" not "normative" - but
AFICT the intent is to provide stable resources that may be used.


On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 08:46 Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> How about just human readable documentation as guidelines to manage
> translation between ontologies, or reducing the ontological implications by
> using skos:closeMatch or similar rather than subClassing or sameAs? By
> publishing a normative document (again, assuming that this is rec track!)
> W3C would be saying that the DCMI's classes have new subclasses, and that
> conforming systems would take this into account.
>
> I don't believe that you can adequately provide test coverage for this to
> get through PR.
>
>
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/260#issuecomment-400119544 using your
> GitHub account
>
>
Received on Monday, 25 June 2018 23:14:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:44 UTC