Re: [dxwg] further PROV alignment, including for mooted WebService class

Note that such mappings tend to be "informative" not "normative" - but
AFICT the intent is to provide stable resources that may be used.


On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 08:46 Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> How about just human readable documentation as guidelines to manage
> translation between ontologies, or reducing the ontological implications by
> using skos:closeMatch or similar rather than subClassing or sameAs? By
> publishing a normative document (again, assuming that this is rec track!)
> W3C would be saying that the DCMI's classes have new subclasses, and that
> conforming systems would take this into account.
>
> I don't believe that you can adequately provide test coverage for this to
> get through PR.
>
>
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/260#issuecomment-400119544 using your
> GitHub account
>
>