W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]

From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:50:56 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-399267609-1529621455-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I believe that our use case falls under that definition, in that both profiles have multiple base specifications, with subclasses, specific interpretations, identified vocabularies for the data instances and are there to accomplish particular functions.

We are not talking about two different real world concepts of "gold", and hence the URI must be the same. If RDF/XML and Turtle are not different datasets, but SKOS and CIDOC-CRM are, then it seems the philosophy of the content negotiation deliverable is not aligned with the DCAT deliverable. 

As a reductio ad absurdum, if in model (A) the requirement is to use`dc:title`, and in model (B) the requirement is to use `rdfs:label` but (A) and (B) are otherwise identical, that would be two different datasets. This seems ... undesirable.

GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/74#issuecomment-399267609 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2018 22:50:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:04 UTC