- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:26:21 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I am a little lost in the multiple things being considered here.
Can I check this RDF as an assertion, based on Ruben's comment <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/74#issuecomment-396729390>:
```
:Dataset_X dcat:distribution :Distribution_Y .
:Distribution_Y
# a dimension, currently missing
dct:conformsTo :Profile_Z ;
# another dimension, currently often catered for
dct:format <some_format> ;
# another example of a dimension
# dct:language is indicated for Catalogue & Dataset only in DCAT1.0 but could be here due to no fixed DCT domain
dct:language <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-1/en> .
```
You could get Distribution_Y by asking for Dataset_X with a distribution conforming to Profile_Z.
Interpretation using ProfileDesc:
* no inference is drawn linking a `dcat:Distribution` to a `prof:ImplResourceDesc` due to no fixed DCT domains however usage makes them look related
* the Profile referenced by the Distribution could be linked to validating tools via the `prof:resource` property, as per intended ProfileDesc use
```
:Profile_Z prof:resource :ImplResDesc_A ;
dct:conformsTo <A_validation_standard> ;
dct:format <some_other_format> ;
prof:resourceRole rolesvoc:ConformanceTest .
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/74#issuecomment-397315278 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2018 14:26:24 UTC