- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:35:28 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Lars, Can you explain the value that you see in having the same URL for both datasets? What gives me pause here in particular is the mention that one is a beefed-up version with links to images. To me, that suggests that they are really two different resources; one clearly contains more stuff. Would you also make both datasets available under separate URLs for human consumption? -Annette On 6/8/18 8:51 AM, Lars G. Svensson via GitHub wrote: > @agreiner scripsit: >> Having multiple profiles available is realized already by just >> offering a version of the dataset that conforms to one profile under >> one URL and a version that applies to another under another URL. >> Sorry I can't recall where it was expressed, but the idea of one URL >> for multiple profiles came from someone else in the group (maybe Lars?). > > Yes, that was me. Our use case is that we have two linked data > serviced offering data about the same entities (e. g. persons and > geographic entities) but using two different metadata profiles. The > first one is our default one served through the domain d-nb.info, e. > g. http://d-nb.info/gnd/118601717/about/lds. the other one is a > beefed-up version also offering things like links to images at > wikimedia commons, e. g. > http://hub.culturegraph.org/entityfacts/118601717 that is used to > drive the entity pages in the German Digital Library at > https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/entity/118601717. The > point is that both representations are about the same entity, > identified by http://d-nb.info/gnd/118601717 and we want to serve both > representations using the same URI. The solution to this would be > profile negotiation. > -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 8 June 2018 18:36:01 UTC