W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2018

RE: public-comments email problem

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:57:26 +0000
To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <280de6c532fe4ba890bc6e79deab9b35@dnb.de>
From: Annette Greiner [mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 2:15 AM
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: public-comments email problem



On 7/19/18 12:32 AM, david.browning@thomsonreuters.com<mailto:david.browning@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:
+1  a good idea

David Browning
Platform Technology Architect

Thomson Reuters

Phone: +41(058) 3065054
Mobile: +41(079) 8126123


From: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> [mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu]
Sent: 19 July 2018 07:29
To: rob@metalinkage.com.au<mailto:rob@metalinkage.com.au>; kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: public-comments email problem


From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au><mailto:rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 01:32
To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: public-comments email problem


On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 04:34 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote:
Dave R contacted the W3C email maven (Gerald Oskoboiny) about the
problems we've been having with the public-comments list rejecting some
emails. It turns out that the way the permissions were set it only
allowed posting by folks who were already on some (any) W3C email list.
This means that many DCAT community people would not have permission to

This has been corrected. At this time anyone should be able to post to
the comments list. We are asking for any information about logs that
could alert us to other rejected emails.

Simon asked if this means that we need to re-do our call for comments.
In the past we've done a follow-up call and that might be useful at this
time. A follow-up could remind folks that a second draft is coming (can
we give a ballpark date, like "fall 2018"?) and that comments received
now could potentially be addressed in that draft. That provides both a
reason for the follow-up and an incentive to reply promptly.

Let us know what you think.
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__kcoyle.net&d=DwMFAg&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=SX6sxEGBIuiEtjQTAWz7jTpuOC0f5DcH79errOWxM8RN6gOsHdAxWfl9GTTkalJj&m=jcWHudA--1IE_AoyRkmD_ivBzMqQI6cpNwuN_M6DFuY&s=PYlffWnlb_p0UzjeFe-iGh4JLIf3E694OXX8IkB7Reg&e=>
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600<tel:+1%20510-984-3600>


Annette Greiner

NERSC Data and Analytics Services

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 20 July 2018 06:57:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:05 UTC