- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 19:30:26 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Thanks indeed, Karen. This is very useful! @Rob: my model is an earlier attempt to caracterize what is in ProfileDesc, but it's not so early ;-) It was at the last F2F. Looking at ProfileDesc, and trying to make sense of it - as you had done already some terminology choices, which I found hard to understand (probably because I missed the flexibility of being able to group notions with slashes ;-) ) Cheers, Antoine On 16/07/18 17:18, Karen Coyle wrote: > Note about dct:Standard and more: > > The DC terms definition of dct:Standard was NOT changed, precisely > because it would have narrowed the definition and rendered some current > data invalid. > > But more significantly, DC is moving toward the use of defining domains > and ranges of DC terms as being the semantic equivalent of schema.org's > "domainIncludes" "rangeIncludes". This is in recognition of the reality > that many uses of DC terms are working with legacy data that predates > the use of IRIs. Domains and ranges thus become recommendations or best > practices, but are not constraints. > > On 7/15/18 5:21 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote: >> >> Thanks for doing this Karen - its very helpful. >> >> A couple of suggestions and notes: (i'll leave you to edit it unless you >> ask me to) >> >> 1) I think Andrea's effort to list a few different constraint languages >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zty4jTzhG0_1xoJlDOMq1XeHelIwVP2-STw6_-_ZxR4/edit#gid=0 is >> significant - it pretty much evidences that there is no single >> constraint language to rule them all. IMHO this needs to be part of the >> guidance - to choose the most appropriate constraint language for your >> community.. > > Yes, I'll add this as a section (or paragraph) on constraint languages. > I assume (at the moment) that constraint LANGUAGEs are optional and > potentially outside of the application profile itself, but represent a > direction that APs should be moving toward, either as the AP language or > as a separate representation of AP-defined constraints. > > kc > >> >> 2) apropos the list of "data models" - Antoine's model is i think an >> early attempt to render the profiledesc concepts being proposed - >> (correct me if i'm wrong) - and it is in any way the same data model >> that is expressed more formally in profiledesc. >> Stephane's model has a different scope - it addresses the much broader >> topic of schema mapping - if you split out the profile description part >> it is trivially consistent with profiledesc, and reinforces its role and >> design - a profile subclasses dcterms:Standard - though this is at risk >> if DC tightens definitions of dcterms:Standard in a non-backward >> compatible way. >> >> I havent located the reference (i think from you) to the proposed >> redefinition of dct:Standard - if this is indeed a possibility then can >> you drop in a link under the data models section - or perhaps we need to >> reopen https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/152 >> >> Rob >> >> >> >> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 02:42 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net >> <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: >> >> As promised on the call yesterday, I've added a wiki page[1] based on my >> own list-making relating to the profile guidance document. It attempts >> to gather in one place various decisions and contributions so that it is >> easier to see where we are in that work. I started it because it felt to >> me that our work in this area is pretty scattered, although I think >> that's in a sense the nature of starting a new document that we haven't >> fully defined as yet. As I also said yesterday, this is far, far from >> complete, but I'll keep working on it, as should others. >> >> I'd like to keep this as a list of pointers, so discussion should take >> place elsewhere, mainly github. We can link to the discussions from here >> so there is a "one-stop" place to find links. >> >> I've added it to the main wiki page under Profiles for the moment. >> >> Let me know if this looks useful. >> >> kc >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileRoundup >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net >> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) >> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <tel:+1%20510-984-3600> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2018 17:30:58 UTC