- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:04 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@nicholascar ah so the issue could be about creating or re-using another property? It wasn't clear from the use of "allow" and the description. Now it makes more sense! But I'd still be worried that we use a constructs that hints at licenses only, as more general rights statements should be in scope. And again I believe this is your perspective too with your notion of 'agreement'. We should be careful about not ending like CCrel's cc:License, which is called 'license' but has a broader scope, quite confusingly for users of the vocabulary. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114#issuecomment-365869684 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 09:25:16 UTC