Re: dxwg-ACTION-76: (and rob and jaroslav) - look at the comments received and bring their ideas to this group before answering

Proposal:

for
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Jan/0000.html

- respond with thank you and ask for the suggested "user stories" to enrich
UCR doc and cross-check assumptions.

for

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Jan/0001.html

re comments on intro - respond that we will be further refining our
definition of profiles, but our default position is to avoid specialistion
of different types of profile unless we identity specific requirements to
provide different guidance based on sub-types. If such requirements can be
identified please provide a supporting Use Case and examples.

re
"5.51 – Multidimensional Metadata Profiles

Tags: Profiles

Stakeholders: data consumer

Description:

Similar data generated by different providers will likely arrive in
different formats and with different properties and restrictions. When
modelling particular applications that consume such diverse data, one
should consider all these different settings and specify what to do
with each of them. For each attribute defined in the domain model, it
should be possible to specify all the related metadata properties used
by the different datasets, their restrictions and relations. There
should also be a canonical view to which all equivalent properties
would map."

Would appreciate other's views on how to interpret this. The first
sentence i think is covered by having distributions specify profiles
they support


re r.5.2, arrangements of vocabularies in constraints
we can note this may be required, but pass it on to the working group to
decide if this is a responsibility of a vocabulary provider or the profile
description mechanisms.

Rob




On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 at 08:16 Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> dxwg-ACTION-76: (and rob and jaroslav) - look at the comments received and
> bring their ideas to this group before answering
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/76
>
> Assigned to: Ixchel Faniel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2018 21:18:39 UTC