- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:00:12 +0000
- To: <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>, <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <d1779ba93fd644b395aaadd9310f8211@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Regarding 1. – this overlaps with the dct:type concern - https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#classifying-dataset-types From: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu [mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu] Sent: Thursday, 20 December, 2018 02:05 To: alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: Proposed agenda for DCAT Subgroup 2018.12.19 Hi, Alejandra, I include below a summary and some considerations about Luca's response [1]: 1. One of Luca's comments is about the resource "types" allowed in DCAT (as subclasses of dcat:Resource). Examples of the ones used in EPOS-DCAT-AP are: Equipment, Facility, Publication, Project, Service and WebService. So, the question is whether the WG thinks they are in scope with DCAT (which links to the discussion we had on the risk of being too permissive in what could be put in the catalogue). 2. Luca clarified what he meant with "composition of resources", which I think can be related to the use cases about has part / is part of relationships. Luca's examples are however not only related to datasets (quoting: "[…] an Equipment that includes other Equipments, or a Facility that contains Equipments or …" ). I think this point is relevant to whether has part / is part of relationships can apply to any DCAT classes, or only some of them. 3. About the "project context", Luca confirmed they have requirements here (but he just provided an example), and it may be worth asking him to verify whether they are or not covered by our use cases and, if not, to complement them. 4. Luca provided an example of a Hydra description of a service / API. As it is a real-world example, I think it would be useful to include it in the DCAT spec – provided that Luca's happy with it. Cheers, Andrea ---- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Dec/0000.html ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran [mailto:alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:41 PM To: PEREGO Andrea (JRC-ISPRA) Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: Proposed agenda for DCAT Subgroup 2018.12.19 Thanks for letting us know, Andrea. If you have time, please let us know about the status of this action: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/270 On 19/12/2018 09:46, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote: Dear Alejandra, all, I have to send my regrets for today's call. My apologies Andrea ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran [mailto:alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:18 PM To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org> Subject: Proposed agenda for DCAT Subgroup 2018.12.19 Proposed agenda https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.12.19#Main_agenda We will focus on: 1. Responses to comments 2. Pull request about identifiers, and other issues on the milestone (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/14)
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 21:00:44 UTC