- From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:42:50 +0000
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
First I've come across it Lars so thanks for bringing it to our attention! Not really sure what to do from here though, other than to re-read their documents and send all of our FPWD notifications to the Declarative Linked Data Apps Community Group. Thanks, Nick -----Original Message----- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> Sent: Friday, 30 November 2018 8:47 PM To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org Subject: Are Linked Data Templates similar to profiles? Hi all, on public-lod, Christopher Gutteridge highlighted that there is no "contract" for what is returned when you dereference a URI [1] which to me sounds like a need for profiles (he even talks about application profiles). Martynas Jusevičius answered [2], that they have something called "Linked Data Templates" [3] that are supposed to solve this. Are any of you familiar with those? [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2018Nov/0025.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2018Nov/0029.html [3] https://atomgraph.github.io/Linked-Data-Templates/ Best, Lars
Received on Monday, 3 December 2018 11:43:21 UTC