W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: CNEG subgroup - proposing Use Case (Issue 239) to Plenary

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:47:36 -0700
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <54675f55-959e-49eb-97db-02bcad7d6b8a@kcoyle.net>
A basic requirement for human readable documentation appears in the use
case but isn't in the list of requirements. If the group agrees, that
can be added as a requirement. (It generally seems like a good idea,
right?)

kc

On 8/31/18 8:16 AM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> I remain +0 for the protocol negotiation part via URL munging, and an
> enthusiastic +1 for the requirement for human readable documentation.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:26 PM Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park)
> <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> wrote:
> 
>     Dear DWGX Conneg Subgroup,
> 
>     This email may appear twice due to a send issue at my end. Please
>     take this copy to be the bet one.
> 
>     We have a left-over action from our last meeting to consider
>     promoting the Use Case “Web browser navigation of profile
>     information” (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/239) to the Plenary
>     group for voting on.
> 
>     Please could Conneg subgroup members reply to this with either +1, 0
>     or -1 to indicate if this Use Case should be sent to Plenary? Votes
>     should be in before the Plenary on 2018-09-04 in order for it to be
>     considered there.
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     Nick
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 16:48:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:45 UTC