> skos:Concept is an instance of owl:Class, so there would be no conflict. @kcoyle actually that is exactly the issue. skos:Concept is an instance of rdfs:Class (owl:Class) - it is a class of all concepts. Then, individual concepts are again instances of skos:Concept. That does not mean that they can have instances. That does not mean that individual concepts are classes (see https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L896). However, using the individual concepts with 'dcterms:type' entails the concept used is an 'rdfsClass' - it can have instances. And that is the issue - mere usage of a concept with dcat this way would unintentionally define that it can have instances. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-416275809 using your GitHub accountReceived on Monday, 27 August 2018 16:00:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC