W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: [profgui] Outlines and requirements

From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:06:08 +0000
To: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A3253EC4-6A93-4FC0-844B-A07060932D1D@csiro.au>
Yes, you're right! That's actually for the profile conneg doc isn't it? In which case it’s this one: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/conneg-by-ap


On 24/8/18, 3:36 pm, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

    Nick, here are your actions from the profiles guidance meeting:
        ncar list other profiles in profileDesc space
        ncar do examples for the plenary of options for profileDesc
    Action 167 is from the conneg group:
    ACTION-167: Create a draft of the conneg guidance doc for next conneg
    Is this what you are referring to? It may be hard to keep the sub-group
    actions straight.
    On 8/23/18 10:00 PM, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote:
    > I have an action (dxwg-ACTION-167) to create a guidance document which I've arranged with the profiling editors means updating the HTML/ReSpec doc in here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/profiles. There is already a shell there but it needs urgent updating so I'll do that in the first few days of next week as for that action and also as a follow-on from the Profile Guidance meeting just had.
    > Nick
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> 
    > Sent: Friday, 24 August 2018 4:11 AM
    > To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
    > Subject: [profgui] Outlines and requirements
    > At the profile guidance meeting yesterday it was suggested that we fit the requirements into the profile guidance document and use those to help us add content. [1]
    > We have 5 different outlines for the document,[2] plus one in the document itself[3]. I could make a document with at least some of these outlines with the related requirements embedded in them so that we could look at them. However, I don't know where I would put them when done - revise the github comments that have outlines? create a wiki page with them? create separate github issues for each one? [4]
    > What's the best way to make these readable and understandable and community editable? What would folks like to see?
    > kc
    > [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/08/22-profgui-minutes.html

    > [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileRoundup

    > [3] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiles/

    > [4] I think it's easier to view these together for comparison, so separate github issues might be hard to view. However, separate issues may make it easier to discuss them.
    > --
    > Karen Coyle
    > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

    > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
    > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
    Karen Coyle
    kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

    m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
    skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Friday, 24 August 2018 11:06:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC